Not digging the administration's SS plan?
Fine - but we need to come up with SOMETHING to encourage Americans to save. Right now, the IRA and 401K laws that allow tax free long-term saving aren't cutting it. And despite the obvious fact that Social Security is (1) not enough to live off of in your retirement years and (2) probably not going to exist in the same form as it does today when we retire, Americans still refuse to save (you'd think that would be incentive enough). The Administration's attempt to increase demand with it's "Spend Spend Spend!" propaganda over the last few years hasn't helped the situation much either.
The capital gains tax cuts under Clinton and Bush don't seem to be helping. And one could argue that Bush's capital gains cut during a war and a recession was immoral (cut taxes on those who make their salaries on stock options to 15% while middle class people have to pay 27% or 33%). In a perfect world, investment profits would be free of taxation. But so would income! 15% is low enough (and probably too low).
So what do we do to encourage saving? Forcing people to do it seems like the best answer (privatize social security!)... The Washington Post (in an Editorial) recently argued for small benefits cuts coupled with a smaller privatization plan than the Administration has put forth. Personally, I think some means testing would also be in order, but only if we privatize and then allow wealthier individuals greater flexibility in opting out and investing in small accounts.
Either way, Democrats need to come up with some sort of government mandated savings program that gets more than 0% a year interest (Social Security) and forces people to invest - because, at this rate, we're going to end up with millions of starving elderly people who earned middle class wages all their life.