Friday, September 03, 2004

Clinton's ok...

And Republicans are evil:

Audience boos as Bush offers best wishes for Clinton's recovery Friday
September 03, 2004
WEST ALLIS, Wis. (AP) President Bush on Friday wished Bill Clinton ``best wishes for a swift and speedy recovery.'' ``He's is in our thoughts and prayers,'' Bush said at a campaign rally. Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed. Bush did nothing to stop them.

Bush offered his wishes while campaigning one day after accepting the presidential
nomination at the Republican National Convention in New York. Clinton was
hospitalized in New York after complaining of mild chest pain and shortness of
breath.


Thursday, September 02, 2004

What an idiot (part 5)

Here's the infamous video of Zell Miller talking to Chris Matthews. Just click on the picture.

I love Chris Matthews...

What an idiot (part 4)

CNN rips Zell Miller apart.

It's about time journalists started calling people on their lies. Isn't that their job?

Saletan hits one out

Read this Will Saletan column and find out what this election is really about:

Preserving democracy.

What an idiot (part 3)


His speech was universally panned. "You cannot criticize a sitting President's foriegn policy!" That was the message, delivered in a shrill southern accent.

Nevermind that the GOP calls Democrats traitors and cowards every day of the week.

What an idiot (part 2)

From Kausfiles:
Watch out, Dan!

"And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American troops
occupiers rather than liberators."
--Zell Miller, keynote address, RNC

"The second thing we see over and over is that the Iraqi people do not like the liberation (sic), which is understandable. Nobody likes to be occupied."
--Dan Senor, Senior
Adviser, Coalition Provisional Authority,
January, 14, 2004

P.S.:
Doesn't President Bush himself use the word "occupier"? Nexising .... Update: My impression is that the period after our invasion of Iraq and before the handoff of sovereignty was and is routinely referred to as "the occupation" by our military and civilian personnel in Iraq itself. Who runs an "occupation" if not "occupiers"? ... The only apposite Bush quote I could find does contain a strong distinction between liberation and occupation, but also tacitly concedes that the pre-handoff period was the latter:

"We will transfer sovereignty to the Iraqi people on June the 30th. Of course, I know I'm--American citizens hear, 'Well, maybe the Iraqis don't want us to occupy them.' Who wants to be occupied? Nobody wants to be occupied. People do want to be liberated. The Iraqis want us there to help with their security, but they want to run their own country. And I don't blame them."

Wednesday, September 01, 2004

Zell Miller

Let's suppose that Presidential contests are decided by who has the best keynote speaker at their convention. The results of this election would be:

John Kerry (Obama) 97%
George Bush (Miller) 3%

What an awful speech by Zell Miller.

Zell Miller HATES it when people make fun of hill billies. That's because he's a redneck/hillbilly/hick/country bumpkin/Cleetus/piece of white trash/moron.

I've never heard this man speak. I'm dumbfounded by how stupid he is. How embarassing for our country that this man is one of our 100 Senators.

Bush's leadership after 9-11

Nonexistant.

Nada.

He did very little. When he heard that we were under attack, he sat motionless for 7 minutes.

The first person I discussed 9-11 with was the cable guy. He said, "Bush is gonna get them bastards."

No - Bush is going to sit motionless for 7 minutes, like a coward.

After that, people have claimed that Bush's visit to Ground Zero showed courage.

Huh? Millions of people went there to gawk. Some of us didn't have cameras or blow horns. Do blow horns make people braver? I always thought they made people louder...

Then he attacked Afghanistan. Wow. That took guts. We lost, what, 10 soldiers in that war?

William Saletan has a great column that sums up what I'm saying:

Pardon me for asking, but where exactly is the heroism in this story? Where, indeed, is the heroism in anything Bush has done before 9/11 or since?

Two days ago at an Ellis Island rally, Dick Cheney described Bush's 9/11 leadership this way: "In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on America, people in every part of the country, regardless of party, took great comfort and pride in the conduct and the character of our president. They saw a man calm in a crisis, comfortable with responsibility, and determined to do everything necessary to protect our people."

Calm and comfortable. I appreciate that. This was a major selling point of Bush's 2000 campaign: He would allow us to "look at the White House with pride." But isn't a president supposed to, um, do things? Isn't it a bit strange to praise a man's leadership not for doing something, but for maintaining a certain appearance?

Bush partisans point out that he did do things in the 9/11 aftermath. In his convention address last night, former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik recalled Bush's famous visit to New York, "inspiring a nation as he stood on hallowed ground, supporting the first responders."

OK, so Bush stood there. He "supported," in a Clintonesque sense, the people who were doing something. He touched the mayor. As Rudy Giuliani told the New York Times over the weekend, "When he got off the helicopter, he put his arm around the back of my neck and said, 'What can I do for you?' It was a personal thing: 'I know what you've been through, and what I can do to support you?'"

Amid all this touching, did Bush put himself in any peril? He certainly did. As Giuliani explained to the convention audience:

When President Bush came here on September 14, 2001, the Secret Service was not really happy about his remaining in the area so long. With buildings still unstable, with fires raging below ground of 2,000 degrees or more, there was good reason for their concern. Well, the president remained there. And talked to everyone. ... [A construction worker] grabbed the president of the United States in this massive bear hug, and he started squeezing him. And the Secret Service agent standing next to me, who wasn't happy about any of this, instead of running over and getting the president out of this grip, puts his finger in my face and he says to me, "If this guy hurts
the president, Giuliani, you're finished."

This is Bush's heroism? Showing up three days later, "remaining in the area," and enduring a hug?


The myth of Bush's bravery. Let's crush it here and now.

Right now Kerry is a little bit behind

Two things have happened over the last month:

1. The Swift Vet charges are sticking. History will probably look back at these Swift Boat ads as another Willie Horton or debate sigh.

2. A new phenomenon called "Kerry hate" is developing. It's arguably as strong as "Bush hate".

Kerry hate has galvanized the Republican base. Now that they firmly believe that John Kerry is a traitor, they can put aside their qualms about George Bush's performance over the last 4 years.

The Swift Vets helped unite the Republican Party. Every right-wing nut case should thank them.

Monday, August 30, 2004

What is Zell Miller talking about?

According to Zell Miller, the National Democratic Party has shifted way to the left. Let's take a look at it issue by issue:

1. Foreign policy: Most Democrats are foreign policy hawks now. In the 70s, 80s, and even early 90s we were peaceniks. John Kerry voted against the Gulf War in 1991, but voted for Gulf War II. That's a move to the right.
2. The Welfare State: Most Democrats support Welfare reform and strong work requirements. In the 70s and 80s, Democrats vigorously defended the old system.
3. Tax cuts: Most Democrats support tax cuts for the lower and middle classes. Bill Clinton built the EITC into a major tax break for the working poor. This used to be the party that advocated tax increases on a regular basis.
4. Labor: Mainstream Democrats have reacted to the weakened position of labor by abandoning labor, or at least not deferring to labor leaders as much. Bill Clinton and John Kerry are free traders: a position that puts them to the right of the mainstream.
5. Cultural issues: The Democrats have moved to the left on these issues. For example, they strongly support gay rights and abortion rights. But the country has moved with them.

So, with the exception of cultural issues, Zell Miller is wrong. Perhaps he's lost his mind.